United States Supply Co. v. Gillespie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pawnee County; Conn Linn, Julge. Action by R. G. Gillespie against the United States Supply Company, a copartnership, and Jacob Bloch, B. M. Bloch, and C. C. Blair, copartners doing business as the United States Supply Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BLEAKMORE, C.
This is an action for damages commenced in the district court of Pawnee county on June 16, 1914, by the defendant in error as plaintiff against the plaintiffs in error as defendants for the unlawful conversion of 2,500 feet of 6%" oil well easing. Defendants answered separately by way of general denial. There was trial to a jury, resulting in judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1,203.75, and defendants have appealed.
Defendants here urge that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment, for the reason that it “wholly failed to show that plaintiff was the owner…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Landa v. ObertTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Earl v. TupperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
- First National Bank of Colorado v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Marcy v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kova Pipe Line Co. v. LilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Trimble v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- United States v. Osage Wind, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024