Legal Opinion
Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 9, 2015No. C-14-5200 EMC; No. C-14-5241 EMCPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1189ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; DENYING DEFENDANT HIREASE’S JOINDER IN MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Ronald Gillette began driving for Uber in the San Francisco Bay Area in March 2013. Gillette Docket No. 7 at ¶ 12. Gillette’s access to the Uber application was “abruptly deactivated” in April 2014. Id. at ¶ 15. According to Gillette, an Uber representative told him he was terminated because “ ‘something had come up’ on his consumer background report.” Id.
Gillette filed a lawsuit against Uber…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Mohammed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.