Legal Opinion
Mohammed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 14, 2017No. 16 C 2537PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
John Z. Lee, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Abdul Mohammed (“Mohammed”), formerly a driver for Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), filed a twenty-one count pro se complaint [1] against Uber, Uber’s wholly owned subsidiary Raster, LLC (“Raster”), as well as individuals Travis Kalanick, Garrett Camp, and Ryan Graves (collectively, “Defendants”). The various counts allege violations of various state and federal laws and the United States Constitution. Defendants have moved to compel arbitration of Mohammed’s claims [14, 17] pursuant to the Federal Arbitration…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- 4 Zone 180 LLC, et al. v. Charles Jones, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
- Abukar v. Experian Information Solutions IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Brady v. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Cohen v. Kering Americas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.