Legal Opinion
Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 8, 2017No. 15-CV-6143 (NGG) (JO); 15-CV-7387 (NGG) (JO)PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these two related putative class actions assert claims under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and other New York statutory and common law against Uber Technologies, Inc. and a number of related or affiliated entities (collectively, “Uber”). In the first action (the “Mumin Action”), Plaintiffs Manzoor Mu-min and Victor Mallh (the “Mumin Plaintiffs”) bring their action against Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and John Does 1-10. (Mumin 3d Am. Compl. (“Mumin Compl.”) (Dkt. 22 in No. 15-CV-6143).) In the…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gaughan v. RubensteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Eisen v. Venulum Ltd.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Spano v. V & J National Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Rimel v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.