Legal Opinion
Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 23, 2017No. 16-CV-545 (PKC) (RER)PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
PAMELA K. CHEN, United States' District Judge:
Plaintiffs are car service drivers (“drivers”) who have brought this lawsuit, as a putative class action, alleging breach of contract by Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant” pr “Uber”), Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. For the reasons stated herein, the Defendant’s motion is GRANTED, and this action is .stayed pending arbitration.
BACKGROUND
1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs’ Agreements with Uber
Uber is a technology company that allows drivers and potential riders to connect through a…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Biller v. S-H OPCO Greenwich Bay ManorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Faggiano v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Uber Techs., Inc. v. RoyzNevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Rimel v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Abraham Baginsky v. Zynga, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.