Legal Opinion

Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. Moore

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 10, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Plaintiff Casco Northern Bank appeals the denial of its motion for approval of attachment and trustee process against the defendants, guarantors of a note. (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.). Plaintiff challenges the finding of the Superior Court that the mortgage granted by the principal debtor to the plaintiff to secure the debt was “other security” available to satisfy the obligation of the guarantor within the meaning of M.R.Civ.P. 4A(c) and 4B(c). Plaintiff argues that by virtue of an unconditional guaranty provided by the guarantor, it has an independent cause of action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. StewartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Top Line Distributors, Inc. v. SpicklerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. Chase Commercial Corp. v. Hamilton & SonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. International Harvester Co. v. FlemingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fleet Bank of Maine v. HarrimanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Morton v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. LapierreDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1992
  4. James v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Ali, Inc. v. FishmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API