Legal Opinion
Fleet Bank of Maine v. Harriman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 23, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] Gregory and Kathryn Harriman appeal from a judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Fleet Bank of Maine after a nonjury trial in the Superior Court (Waldo County, Marsano, J.). On appeal, the Harri-mans contend that Fleet was not entitled to foreclose under the terms of its guaranty contract with the federal government. We affirm the judgment.
[¶2] The Harrimans are dairy farmers who reside in Troy. In 1990, having sold their previous farm, they sought a loan to finance the purchase of the farm in Troy. They initially requested a direct loan from the Farmer’s Home Administration…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schuerman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- FO Bailey Co., Inc. v. Ledgewood, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- William G. Parker and Julia Parker v. United States Department of Agriculture, Richard Lyng, Secretary Lawrence Mashburn and Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Alder v. FIRST NAT. BANK AND TRUST CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Devine v. Roche Biomedical LaboratoriesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stull v. First American Title InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Harriman v. Border Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Net 2 Press, Inc. v. 58 Dix Avenue Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Davis v. R C & Sons Paving, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.