Legal Opinion
Morton v. Miller
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 10, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD, Justice.
Defendants James and Pamela Miller appeal, and plaintiff John Morton cross-appeals, from an order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) denying the Millers’ motion for modification of an order for attachment and trustee process, and Morton’s motion for additional attachment. The Millers also attack the constitutionality of Maine’s attachment law and procedure. We affirm the order.
In April 1990, Morton brought an action against the Millers alleging undue influence, unjust enrichment, fraudulent inducement, and the existence of a constructive trust. Morton…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Town of Eustis v. Stratton-Eustis Development Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Maine National Bank v. AnderschatSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Springer v. SpringerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- In Re BarrettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2007
- CENTRIX BANK AND TRUST v. KehlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Thompson MacHine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Jacques v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.