Legal Opinion
Top Line Distributors, Inc. v. Spickler
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 21, 1987PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD, Justice.
The defendant, Robert Spickler, the guarantor of a contract entered into between the plaintiff, Top Line Distributors, Inc. (Top Line), and Ocean View Harbor Homes (Ocean View) appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, affirming the judgment of the Dis trict Court, Portland. 1 The District Court granted judgment in favor of Top Line after denying Spickler’s motion to dismiss its complaint, and ruled for Top Line on Spickler’s counterclaim. Spickler also contends the District Court erred in awarding Top Line reasonable attorneys’ fees. We find no error…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cox v. HaganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Poussard v. Commercial Credit Plan, Incorporated of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- McClain v. Continental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ocean National Bank of Kennebunk v. OdellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- United States v. Southern Cycle Accessories, Inc., Grace v. Thielman GillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Negro Nest, LLC v. Mid-Northern Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Chadwick-BaRoss, Inc. v. T. Buck Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- United Carolina Bank v. BeesleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Fleet Bank of Maine v. HarrimanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.