Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. v. Fleming

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 5, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On report. Assumpsit to recover a balance due on a note given by Ora A. Fleming and guaranteed 'by the defendant. Plea, the general issue with a brief statement alleging “that the consideration for which the supposed guaranty was made has wholly failed.” At the conclusion of the evidence the case was reported to the Law Court for determination. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.

Assumpsit to recover a balance due on a note given by Ora A. Fleming and guaranteed by the defendant.

*105On May 7, 1907, Ora A. Fleming of Lincoln, Maine, signed the following note as promissor:

“$675.00 Lincoln, Maine, 5-7 1907 BOSTON NUMBER

32068 Year 1907

On or before the first day of Oct., 1907, for value received, I promise to pay to International Harvester Company of America, or order, the sum of Six Hundred and Seventy-five Dollars no interest until due at 6 per cent, from date.

Payable at Lincoln, Me.

After maturity this note shall draw interest at 8 per cent.

It is expressly agreed that the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. Fleet Bank of Maine v. HarrimanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API