Roeder v. Roeder
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff, August Edward Boeder, brought this action against his grandniece, Margaret Jane Boeder, to set aside a deed and to compel a reconveyance of certain real property on the ground that such deed had been secured by fraud, undue influence and mistake, and that there had not been a valid delivery. The trial court found a valid delivery, and that there was no fraud or undue influence, that plaintiff was competent at the time of delivery, and that the parties intended (defendant having so averred in her answer) that a life estate should be reserved to plaintiff. Judgment was entered…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Brown v. Canadian Indus. Alcohol Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Estate of Zins Ex Rel. Kelsch v. ZinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. ScherrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.