Nobles v. Hutton
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County and from an order denying a new trial. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The purpose of this action is to set aside a certain deed, purporting to convey the lands therein described to defendant, and to quiet title to said lands.
The plaintiff, having been, prior to the commencement of this action, adjudged by the superior court to be an incompetent, and a guardian of her estate and person thereupon appointed, brought the suit and is a party hereto by her general guardian.
Judgment was awarded to plaintiff, setting aside the deed and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Highberger v. StifflerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Slack v. ReesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Soberanes v. SoberanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Millican v. MillicanTexas Supreme Court · 1859
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Curtis v. ArmagastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ham v. HamMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.