Gardner v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiffs the difference between the amount defendants paid plaintiffs for a trucking job at the hourly rate and the larger amount allegedly due at the ton-mileage rate. Both minimum rates were fixed in public tariffs issued by the Railroad Commission (now the Public Utilities Commission) pursuant to the Highway Carriers’ Act. (Stats. 1935, ch. 223, p. 878; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 5129a; now Public Utilities Code, §§ 3501-3809.) As grounds for reversal, defendants rely on these two principal contentions: (1) that plaintiffs waived the higher…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- California Adj. Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Higby v. Calavers CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Rossiter v. BenoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Price v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.