Legal Opinion
Fratt v. Robinson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1953No. 13111PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
It is alleged in the complaint which was filed in the United States District Court, that the defendants-appellees acquired corporate stock from the plaintiff-appellant through fraudulent representations by the use of the United States mails, the telephone, and other means and instrumental-ities of interstate commerce; thus violating Securities Exchange Commission’s Rule X-10B-5 which implements § 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 881, 891, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j. Of specific application here is § 10(b), subdivision (b) of § 78j, 15 U.S.C.A. Hereinafter we…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Kardon v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman v. R. Philip SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.