Legal Opinion
Berkla v. Corel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 2002No. Nos. 00-15166, 00-15350 and 00-15508PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge SEDWICK.
ORDER
The opinion filed on May 9, 2002, slip op. at 6739, and reported at 290 F.3d 983, is withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With the filing of the amended opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Tashima votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Hug and Sedwick so recommend. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Glacier Films (Usa), Inc. v. Andrey TurchinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Assessment Technologies of Wi, LLC v. Wiredata, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- City of Emeryville v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Psm Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.