Warthan v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge
Appellants Todd C. and Gina Warthan contend the district court erred in concluding Minnesota law does not require respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family) to pay underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under appellants’ insurance contract with respondent.
FACTS
This ease arises out of an accident that occurred on December 28, 1995, on a Minnesota highway. Appellants, who are Wisconsin residents, collided with a vehicle operated by a third party. All parties agree the third party’s negligence was the sole cause of the accident. The third party’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Hoeschen v. South Carolina Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Hoeschen v. South Carolina Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Aguilar v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ziegelmann v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Ziegelmann v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004