Legal Opinion
Hoeschen v. South Carolina Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1984No. C5-83-1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Stearns County District Court denying appellant South Carolina Insurance Company’s motion for Summary Judgment and declaring respondent Paul Hoeschen entitled to recover underinsured motorist protection benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
This appeal arises from an automobile accident that occurred on September 5, 1982. Hoeschen was a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by Kenneth Floyd High, Jr. when that vehicle was in a one-car rollover accident occurring in Stearns County, resulting in serious personal injury to Hoeschen.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. MaloneySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Klang v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KraayenbrinkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Hoeschen v. South Carolina Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.