Legal Opinion
Hoeschen v. South Carolina Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 1985No. C5-83-1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
This appeal arises out of a judgment declaring that respondent Paul Hoeschen is entitled to recover underinsured motorist benefits up to $25,000 under a policy of automobile insurance issued by South Carolina Insurance Company (South Carolina). The court of appeals, 349 N.W.2d 833, af firmed the judgment of the trial court, and this court granted further review. We affirm.
Hoeschen and Kenneth Floyd High, Jr., Army sevicemen stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, were on leave in Minnesota on September 5, 1982, when High’s automobile left the road and overturned. Hoes-chen…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Klang v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Wondra v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.