Legal Opinion

Ziegelmann v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Companies

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 21, 2004No. A04-412PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

A North Dakota resident injured in a motor-vehicle accident in Minnesota settled the underlying tort case for 90% of the tortfeasor’s liability-coverage limits. The North Dakota resident then sought to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from his own insurer. The UIM insurer denied benefits on the ground that the policy terms required exhaustion of a tortfeasor’s liability limits and moved for summary judgment. The district court denied the motion for summary judgment but, upon insurer’s request, certified to this court the question of whether the principles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Dohney v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Aguilar v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toni Brill v. Mid-Century Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Ziegelmann v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API