Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2005No. CC C011903CR; CA A117718; SC S51600PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

This case involves the use of prior juvenile delinquency adjudications to increase sentences for adult felony convictions under the Oregon Felony Sentencing Guidelines (guidelines). Under the guidelines, prior juvenile adjudications for person felonies, 1 like prior adult criminal convictions, increase a convicted defendant’s criminal history score, which, in turn, usually operates to increase the convicted defendant’s sentence. Unlike adult criminal trials, however, juvenile delinquency proceedings in Oregon are conducted without a jury.

On review, defendant first argues generally that,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Welch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. State v. Hand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. NguyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API