Legal Opinion

A. F. v. Oregon Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 2012No. 100565295; A148861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

The Department of Human Services (DHS) appeals from a trial court judgment that reversed DHS’s administrative determination that mother had neglected her child based on the court’s conclusion that DHS had failed to prove an “actual risk” of harm to the child.1 We reverse.

On December 11, 2009, DHS received a report that mother’s five-year-old child, T. R., had told school officials that his father “went loco” and “tried to stab him with a knife.” T. R. also stated that his father was living with him and mother. DHS officials were aware that father had been designated as a predatory sex…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Pendleton School District 16R v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hood River County v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Pendleton School Dist. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meier v. Salem-Keizer School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Querbach v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Department of Human Services v. P. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Meier v. Salem-Keizer School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API