Legal Opinion

Selig Cahn, Inc. v. California Wrecking Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1937No. L. A. 16269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The respondent in this action recovered a judgment upon two promissory notes made by the appellant. As a defense to the action the appellant asserts that these notes were paid by two others later given by it. The principal question presented by the appeal is whether there is evidence to support the findings of the trial court to the contrary.

In 1934, Selig Cahn and his son Julian Cahn were president and vice-president respectively and also directors of the appellant corporation. Selig Cahn had full charge of all of its finances and accounts. On July 15, 1934, the corporation executed and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Welch v. AllingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Imperial-Yuma Production Credit Assn. v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. American Marine Paint Co. v. TooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Frank v. Repp & MottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. In re ZemanskyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API