In re Zemansky
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLZER, District Judge.
This matter comes' before the court on a review from a decision of the Referee in Bankruptcy holding that the claim filed by one Corrine Hart is based upon a usurious transaction, and accordingly ruling that the interest paid by the bankrupts upon *629certain notes should be deducted from said claim.
While the trustee originally also sought to have reviewed a further ruling of the Referee adjudging that the former was not entitled to a deduction from said claim in a sum equal to treble the amount of the alleged usurious interest, such contention was abandoned at the oral…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nichols v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Clemens v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Sharp v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- In Re RichardsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1967
- Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955