Legal Opinion

In re Zemansky

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 7, 1941No. 34490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLZER, District Judge.

This matter comes' before the court on a review from a decision of the Referee in Bankruptcy holding that the claim filed by one Corrine Hart is based upon a usurious transaction, and accordingly ruling that the interest paid by the bankrupts upon *629certain notes should be deducted from said claim.

While the trustee originally also sought to have reviewed a further ruling of the Referee adjudging that the former was not entitled to a deduction from said claim in a sum equal to treble the amount of the alleged usurious interest, such contention was abandoned at the oral…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Nichols v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. Clemens v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Sharp v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. In Re RichardsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1967
  3. Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API