Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In the year 1878 the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company issued to one Charles L. Taylor a policy of life insurance, whereby it agreed to pay his wife, defendant Alice A. Taylor, the sum of three thousand dollars, and accruing profits, upon his death, provided that he and his beneficiary complied with all the terms and conditions of said policy. On January 6, 1895, in settlement of an indebtedness of $2,501.00 then existing on the part of Mr. Taylor in favor of plaintiff Carrie E. Bridge and found to be due her upon a statement of an account, Mr. Taylor made, executed, and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Braun v. CrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Mitchell v. Automobile Owners Indemnity UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- First State Bank v. LangMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.