Legal Opinion
Imperial-Yuma Production Credit Assn. v. Shields
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1946No. Civ. 3398PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
On February 28, 1944, plaintiff instituted this action alleging that a promissory note in the sum of $6,281.12, payable August 8, 1940, was made and executed by defendants; that the sum of $2,858.64 had been paid thereon, and that there was a past due balance of $3,422.48 and interest from June 26, 1943; that defendant executed a crop and chattel mortgage as security therefor and that all the crops secured thereby were disposed of and no security for the payment of the note was available. Judgment was sought for the balance due.
Defendants answered, admitted the execution of the note, but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Brush v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Pettigrew v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Whitfield v. De BrincatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Imperial-Yuma Production Credit Ass'n v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Haley v. Bay Cities Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.