Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. Dresbach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from the judgment and order denying its motion for a new trial.
The action was brought by plaintiff to recover of respondents the sum of $52,401.60, and interest, for. money lent and advanced to the latter by the former.
The action was commenced against William Dresbach and Hugh J. Glenn, as copartners under the firm name of William Dresbach, but in consequence of the death of Glenn, and also of the first administrator of his estate, N. D. Rideout, the second administrator was substituted as a party, and the action came to be against Dresbach and Rideout, administrator of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tobey v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Putnam v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Muldon v. WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- McMurray v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Blair & Hoge v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.