Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Bauer
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1951No. Civ. 14547PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J
Defendants * appeal from a judgment granting specific performance of an agreement to transfer an on-sale general liquor license, pursuant to the terms of a limited partnership agreement.
Questions Pbesented
They are practically the same as those this day decided in Michael Saso, Jr. v. Joe A. Furtado and Inez R. Furtado, post, p. 759 [232 P.2d 583]. The main difference between the facts of this case and those of the Saso case is that here the license was pledged as security for the payment of a loan, while in the Saso case the agreement was to retransfer the license to the lessor upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Gregory v. HeckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- V. & S. Bottle Co. v. Mountain Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Saso v. FurtadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. VanniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Holt v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Golden v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.