Toney v. Parker Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The primary issue on certiorari is whether the Court of Appeals erred when it dismissed this case upon concluding that denial of temporary total disability presents interlocutory judicial action of the Workers’ Compensation Court which is not reviewable under the provisions of 85 O.S.Supp.1977 § 3.6 B. We hold that this proceeding is prosecuted from a reviewable decision and should hence be reinstated.
Reviewability of judicial decisions in a compensation case is measured by statutory criteria quite different from those applicable to judgments or orders of the district court.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes Motor Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Royal Mining Co. v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- McCallum Forber v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Reid v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Yeatman v. Northern Oklahoma Resource Center of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Dominic v. Creek Nation, State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. PrattCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Wheaton v. City of Tulsa Fire DepartmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.