Dominic v. Creek Nation, State Insurance Fund
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
We are asked to decide whether an insurer who has accepted workers’ compensation policy premiums computed on the claimant’s salary may contest before the Workers’ Compensation Court the insured’s status as a covered employer. We answer in the negative.
Patricia Dominic (Dominic or claimant) sought workers’ compensation benefits after an on-the-job injury while employed by the Creek Nation (Nation). Nation had secured her insurance coverage through the State Insurance Fund (Fund). After Dominic’s claim was filed, Fund first paid temporary total disability and then challenged the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- State Insurance Fund v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Hughes Motor Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Fox v. National CarrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Miller v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Wahpepah v. Kickapoo Tribe of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Waltrip v. Osage Million Dollar Elm CasinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Shorter v. Tulsa Used Equipment & Industrial Engine ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Hall v. Cherokee NationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.