Legal Opinion
Arrow Tool & Gauge v. Mead
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 31, 2000No. 92,782PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
" 1 The dispositive issue tendered for corrective relief on certiorari is whether claimant's motion to reopen her workers' compensation claim, based upon a change in her condition, was filed within the time prescribed by the provisions of 85 O.S. Supp. 1997 § 48(C). We answer in the affirmative.
I
ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
12 On 13 January 1990 Deborah J. Mead (Mead or claimant), a press operator for Arrow Tool & Gauge (Arrow), 1 felt a popping sensation in her left knee as she swept the floor around her work area. When she awoke the next day with a swollen knee, she sought medical attention. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Wylie v. ChesserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Johnson v. City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Humphries v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.