Legal Opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Pratt
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 10, 1990No. 74242PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BAILEY, Judge:
Petitioner Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Employer) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court sitting en banc affirming the Trial Court’s award of twenty-three percent (23%) permanent partial disability (PPD) to Respondent Donald L. Pratt (Claimant) for on-the-job injury to back. Herein, Employer asserts the order is not supported by the medical evidence. Claimant responds, correctly pointing out (1) Employer did not object to Claimant’s medical evidence showing compensable PPD in a percentage exceeding the award of benefits, thus…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Goombi v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Toney v. Parker Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Advanced Medical Instruments v. KeoCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993