Eva v. Symons
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. David E. Marchus, and Charles C. Boynton, for Appellants. M. C. Chapman, Frederick C. Clift, and R. H. Latimer, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Ejectment. Plaintiffs are the heirs at law and devisees of James Eva, deceased, whose last will was duly probated, his estate settled, and final distribution made and the executors discharged. The land in question was distributed to plaintiffs and they bring the action for possession, for damages for withholding possession, and for rents and profits. Defendants denied specifically the averments of the complaint, and claimed to be the equitable owners of the land by virtue of verbal gift of James Eva in his lifetime and possession taken thereunder and ever since retained, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Cavagnaro v. DelmasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Reeder v. Wells, Fargo & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Poswa v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.