Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Wells, Fargo & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1910No. Civ. No. 864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. R. Hervey, Judge. ' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiffs through the breach of contract of defendant as a common carrier to deliver safely a certain trunk and its contents. Judgment was awarded defendant and plaintiffs have appealed.

From the findings of fact made by the trial court it appears that on the twenty-fourth day of June, 1909, plaintiffs delivered to defendant at Long Beach, California,' a trunk and its contents. Defendant thereupon undertook and agreed to transmit to Los Angeles and deliver “to plaintiffs or their agent personally, or, if for any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. California Central RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Donlon Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. First National Bank v. FalkenhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Larsen v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muelder v. Western Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. McMullin v. Lyon Fireproof Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. McQueen v. TylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Jolly v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API