Milmoe v. Dixon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Defendants appeal from an adverse judgment for the sum of $12,500 as damages for fraud in their sale of an improved real property. They demand a reversal on the ground that the evidence does not support the findings.
In March, 1948, respondents purchased from appellants for $21,000 five and a half acres of realty improved by two structures referred to herein as the main house and the guest house. Both dwellings had been erected by appellants. They commenced construction in 1938 pursuant to a building permit obtained for a structure 18 x 21 feet comprising only the dining room, bedroom and bath…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Rogers v. WardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dow v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Curran v. HeslopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Sanfran Co. v. Rees Blow Pipe Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.