Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1941No. Civ. 12311PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for damages for fraud in inducing plaintiffs to enter into a contract for the purchase of real property. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, bought a lot in the neighborhood of Westwood Village from the two defendant corporations, through their agent, defendant Spradling. The property was purchased under an option agreement, which contained the following provision:

“I have personally inspected the above described property and have read this option. I understand its provisions and I am purchasing the property described therein…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Speck v. WylieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Wedge v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. O'Shea v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API