Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for damages for fraud in inducing plaintiffs to enter into a contract for the purchase of real property. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, bought a lot in the neighborhood of Westwood Village from the two defendant corporations, through their agent, defendant Spradling. The property was purchased under an option agreement, which contained the following provision:
“I have personally inspected the above described property and have read this option. I understand its provisions and I am purchasing the property described therein…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Speck v. WylieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Wedge v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- O'Shea v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.