Legal Opinion

Curran v. Heslop

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1953No. Civ. 19225PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit against Victoria Heslop, Hortense Low, and Mercedes L. Foster, former owners of a parcel of realty, and Herbert Hawkins, a realtor, for rescission of a contract to purchase the realty, and for damages. Judgment was for plaintiff against the former owners, and for Hawkins against plaintiff. The former owners appeal. They will be referred to as the defendants.

About November 10, 1950, plaintiff agreed in writing to purchase a parcel of realty ownedriby defendants. The property was improved with a dwelling. The complaint alleged, and the court found, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Reed v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API