Legal Opinion

De Lano v. City of Tulsa

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1928No. 8027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity, brought by Raymond J. De Lano to enjoin the city of Tulsa, Okl., its mayor, commissioners, and building inspector, from exercising jurisdiction over a certain tract of land alleged to be not within the limits of the city of Tulsa, and particularly from exercising jurisdiction under a certain Zoning Ordinance No. 2576. It appears from the allegations of plaintiff’s bill and the evidence introduced in its support, that De Lano, a resident of Kansas City, Mo., and one Park, a resident of Tulsa county, Okl., in the latter part of November, 1923,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Barton v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. City of Blackwell v. City of NewkirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Biggerstaff v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Champion Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Geneva Inv. Co. v. City of St. Louis, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Cromwell-Franklin Oil Co. v. Oklahoma CityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Peerless Realty & Operating Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. County of Will v. StanfillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API