Legal Opinion

Biggerstaff v. City of Altus

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1926No. 16127PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, instituted this action against the city of Altus and A. C. Lock, as county treasurer of Jackson county, Okla., asking injunctive relief upon the grounds that the tax authorities of said city had made assessments for paving tax against certain property of the plaintiff, and tl»t they were without authority to make said assessment, for the reason that said property was not situated within the corporate limits of said city.

The record discloses that the city of Al-tus has been a city of the first class since 1909; that on the 15th day of June, 1922, the city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. City of Blackwell v. City of NewkirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. McGrew v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. City of Maud v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. MaltsbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Moore v. City of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API