Barton v. Stuckey

This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, against the defendant in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, for the pu,vpose of recovering certain taxes which were paid under protest.

The record discloses that the plaintiff owned a tract of land consisting of approximately 20 acres adjoining the corporate limits of the city of Tulsa; that by ordinance No. 1017, approved January 14, 1910, the city limits were extended to embrace this tract of land; that the city of Tulsa operates under a charter form of government and this ordinance was passed…