Legal Opinion
Cromwell-Franklin Oil Co. v. Oklahoma City
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 20, 1930No. 1143PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, District Judge.
In this action, hearing was had upon the motion of the defendant to dismiss complainant’s bill. The bill alleges that the complainant is a Delaware corporation, licensed to do business in Oklahoma; that the city of Oklahoma City is a municipal corporation; that the amount in controversy exceeds $3,000; that on the 15th of October, 1929, and for a long time prior thereto, one W. F. Harn was the owner and in possession of certain real estate adjacent to Oklahoma City, which we will designate for brevity as the Harn tract, and that on said date, the said W. F. Harn and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Bernstein v. BushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- K. & L. OIL CO. v. Oklahoma CityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1936
- Adkins v. City of West FrankfortDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1943
- Friel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.