City of Blackwell v. City of Newkirk
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original action by the City of Blackwell against the City of Newkirk and others to contest a county seat election.
1Opinion of the CourtPia Yes, J.
In pursuance of a provision of section G, art. 17, Constitution, and by virtue of a call and order of the Governor, an election was held in Kay county on the 2d day of December, 1908, at which the city .of Elackwell and the city of Newkirk were voted upon as candidates for the permanent county seat of Kay county. After the returns .of said election had been made to the Governor of the state, as by law provided, the Governor canvassed the votes, and declared that it was shown by said returns that the city of Blackwell received 2,656 votes and the city of Newkirk received 2,707 votes for tlie…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Crook, Horner & Co. v. Old Point Comfort Hotel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1893
- Best v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- McGrew v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Fairfax Drainage District v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Biggerstaff v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Harlow v. Board of Com'rs of Payne CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- City of Maud v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.