Legal Opinion

Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2003No. S-10293/10294PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc. brought suit against property owners who were seeking to have their land rezoned to permit its use as a private airstrip. After settling with one defendant on the eve of trial, Concerned Citizens prevailed at trial against the Cizeks, and the superior court awarded it $40,000 in attorney’s fees. The court justified this award both as partial public interest litigant fees and enhanced prevailing party fees under Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 82. We affirm the superior court’s action in its entirety: the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dobos v. IngersollAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Thorstenson v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Integrated Resources Equity Corp. v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Taylor Construction Services, Inc. v. URS Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Vazquez v. CampbellAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API