Vazquez v. Campbell
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Challenged in this case is an award of actual attorney's fees and costs against Seott and Sherry Vazquez, who unsuccessfully opposed Diana Campbell's effort to enforce a child custody order entered by an Oregon court. The trial court concluded that the Vazquezes had engaged in bad faith litigation and thus an award of full fees was justified.
We find it unnecessary to decide whether the Vazquezes litigated in bad faith. The enforcement petition was brought pursuant to Alaska's version of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), AS…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Leege v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Still v. CunninghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Krone v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- ANTINI v. ANTINISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- ANTINI v. ANTINISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.