Legal Opinion

Taylor Construction Services, Inc. v. URS Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1988No. S-2014PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED by an evenly divided court.

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice, joined by MATTHEWS, Justice, would affirm the superior court for the following reasons.

This appeal arises from a contract dispute among Taylor Construction Services, *101Inc. and Ritchie Transportation Company, Inc. (“Taylor-Ritchié”), URS Company (“URS”), and the City of Wrangell (“Wrangell”). Taylor-Ritchie contracted with Wrangell to perform a project engineered by URS. An unresolved dispute led Taylor-Ritchie to sue Wrangell and URS for contract balances and delay and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Tolstrup v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Brinkerhoff v. Swearingen Aviation Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of Kenai v. BurnettAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Progressive Corp. v. Peter Ex Rel. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API