Legal Opinion

Dobos v. Ingersoll

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2000No. S-8567, S-8707PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Gary Dobos hit pedestrian Margarita In-gersoll with his taxi. At the scene, taxi passenger Dorman Lodge made a statement to a police officer. This statement was admitted at the personal injury trial by the trial court under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. The jury subsequently found Dobos liable for the accident. Dobos appeals the decision to admit this statement, claiming that it prejudiced his trial. He also appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a directed verdict. Inger-soll cross-appeals, contesting the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Kevin F. Marchand v. Mercy Medical Center, an Idaho Corporation, and Neil K. Farris, D.O.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Karon L. Comeaux Sherrika Marzette Comeaux v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cartee v. CarteeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Getchell v. LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API