Legal Opinion

Mahlstedt v. Fugit

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1947No. Civ. 15692PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment granting an injunction restraining him for a period of ten years after May 6, 1941, in Los Angeles County, (1) from entering into or conducting any orchard heater business, either as manager or owner, and from soliciting or diverting any of plaintiff’s orchard heater business or customers; (2) from acting as salesman or representative of any company or person other than California Orchard Heater Company, the fictitious name under which plaintiff was doing business; (3) from using or permitting the use of the name “C. A. Fugit,” “Fugit,” “Fugit Smokeless…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gregory v. SpiekerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. General Paint Corp. v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Brown v. KlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Shafer v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Swenson v. FileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Monogram Industries, Inc. v. Sar Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Vancil v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hill Medical Corporation v. WycoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API