Gregory v. Spieker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court oí Sacramento County. A. P. Gatlin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Action begun October 4, 1892, to enjoin the violation of a contract, and to recover damages for *151the fraudulent breach thereof. The following facts, among others, were alleged by plaintiff and found by the court below: Defendant owned a liquid compound known as “ Eobert’s Kidney and Liver Bitters” and the formula for the manufacture thereof, and the goodwill of the business of making and vending the same; on January 7, 1884, while engaged in such business at the county of Sacramento, and having then a large sale of such hitters in said county and throughout this state, the defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peltz v. EicheleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Warfield v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- El Modello Cigar Manufacturing Co. v. GatoSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Ragsdale v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Howard v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.