Legal Opinion
General Paint Corp. v. Seymour
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1932No. Docket No. 8284PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
On and prior to February 18, 1928, appellants were the owners of and were conducting a paint and varnish business, with their factory and principal place of business in the city of Los Angeles. On that date they sold to respondent’s assignor, the California Paint Company, this business, including its goodwill. As part of the sale, appellants executed and delivered their written agreement, hereafter fully set forth, agreeing not to engage in such business for a period of five years. Subsequently the California Paint Company assigned all of its rights to respondent. From and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gregory v. SpiekerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Grogan v. ChaffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Brown v. KlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kolani v. GluskaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bd. of Regents, Etc. v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.