Brown v. Kling
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Grange County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
In this case a demurrer was interposed to the complaint on the ground of insufficient statement of facts. It was sustained, and plaintiff declined to amend. Judgment was thereupon entered, and plaintiff appeals.
The complaint in substance states that theretofore defendant and one Challis carried on a retail butcher business in Santa Ana and the city of Orange, which cities are about three and one-half miles apart. They had shops in these cities and run wagons distributing and selling meat in the vicinity. April 18,1892, plaintiff purchased their shops, implements, wagons, fixtures,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Langan v. LanganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by29 opinions
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Swenson v. FileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- General Paint Corp. v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Mahlstedt v. FugitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.