Legal Opinion

Converse v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1902No. S.F. No. 2827PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action is brought by the mother of Henry C. Converse on an account stated between said Henry and another son of plaintiff, named Albert E. Converse. The account is alleged to have been stated between the brothers on August 30, 1898, and evidenced an indebtedness from Albert to Henry of fifteen hundred dollars. Henry died intestate on January 16, 1899, and the plaintiff, as his sole heir, succeeded to the claim against Albert. Albert also died on February 21, 1899, and the defendant herein was his surviving widow (since married again), and is administratrix of his estate. At the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Watkins v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Baird v. CrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Toulouse v. PareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Vaughan v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Vassere v. JoergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Carton Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API